Skip to content
Get started
RunningEnterprise challenge · Insurance · Vietnam

AI for Insurance Challenge × Tasco

In Vietnam, insurance is still a piece of paper you can lose. Change that by 15 October.

The question

How might we make insurance in Vietnam something people are glad to hold — easy to buy, easy to carry, easy to claim?
Set by Tasco's leadership team, with GenAI Fund
  • 10 teams

    present live at demo day on 22 October

  • Up to US$100,000

    investment considered for teams that come through the pilot

  • 4 weeks

    of pilot with the business owners who would run it

You don't need a finished product to apply. You need a point of view and three weeks.

The challenge

Compulsory motor insurance is something nearly every driver in Vietnam has to carry. It is mandated and priced by regulation, so every provider offers the same cover at the same price — and when a product is regulated into sameness, the experience around it stops improving.

  • It's still paper

    Lose the paper and, in every way that matters, you've lost the policy.

  • People buy it because they must

    A compliance purchase, with no relationship before or after the sale.

  • Few know what they're covered for

    Most people find out the difference at the worst possible moment.

  • You have to carry it, or pay

    If you can't produce it when you're stopped, you're fined.

  • Every product looks the same

    Same cover and the same regulated price, right across the market.

  • Claiming means a call and some hope

    Support runs through hotlines, and nobody can see where a claim stands.

One hard constraint

No premium discounts, cashback or disguised price incentives. The point is a better experience, not a bought outcome. Everything else is open.

This is not a hypothetical enterprise partner

Tasco is one of Vietnam's major multi-sector groups, listed on the Hanoi Stock Exchange. If you've driven through a toll gate in Vietnam, you've already used something they built.

The group operates across the entire life of a vehicle and its owner: automotive distribution and retail, electronic toll collection through VETC, insurance, roadside assistance, after-sales service, vehicle care and charging infrastructure. Its nationwide network of showrooms and service centres carries Geely and Lynk & Co, with Mitsui as a strategic shareholder in Tasco Auto.

Insurance sits inside that ecosystem rather than beside it. That's why Tasco can see the customer's whole journey — the car, the road, the service centre, the claim — instead of just the policy.

  • Automotive retail
  • Electronic tolling (VETC)
  • Insurance
  • Roadside assistance
  • After-sales & vehicle care
  • Charging infrastructure
  • HNX: HUT
  • VETC
  • Geely
  • Lynk & Co
  • Mitsui

Why Tasco is doing this at all

Tasco's ambition is to change what insurance feels like for people in Vietnam: protection that's simple to buy, impossible to lose, clear to understand, and straightforward to claim. Millions of drivers currently hold a product they're required to have and nobody has made worth wanting.

That's the thing you'd be building. Not a feature — the experience itself.

Who can apply

Judged on the solution, not the company. One person with a prototype and a software house with a product in market apply the same way.

  • Solo builder
  • Student team
  • Early-stage startup
  • Late-stage startup
  • Unicorn
  • ISV / software house
  • Systems integrator
  • Enterprise team
  • Agency

No cash prize. A buyer instead.

Most pilots die for one reason: the people in the room couldn't buy anything. This challenge fixes that part first.

  • The people reviewing your work can say yes

    Tasco's leadership and the business owners who run its insurance operation set the brief, sit at demo day and choose what moves forward. The budget is allocated.

  • A partner that has already done this

    In September 2026, Tasco led an investment round into BonBon, a startup it first met through its own innovation programme, with GenAI Fund investing alongside.

  • Investment of up to US$100,000

    Teams that come through the pilot can be considered for investment, on top of the commercial relationship. Offered at the partners' discretion, after due diligence.

Directions to build from

Eight places the experience breaks, in the order a customer meets them. Take one, combine several, or make a better case for your own.

BuyingGetting covered should take minutes, not a call-back

  • 01

    Frictionless purchase and renewal

    Buy, renew and pay without a queue, a call-back, or a form you fill in twice.

  • 02

    Understand before you buy

    Explain cover in plain language, so people know what they're getting.

  • 03

    The right cover for the right person

    Use consented data to fit protection to one driver, not an average one.

CarryingThe policy should be there when it's needed

  • 04

    Proof in your pocket

    Digital, instantly verifiable, impossible to lose or leave at home.

  • 05

    Help that arrives first

    Renewal reminders and useful prompts that come before the problem does.

  • 06

    Answers at the moment of need

    Support through chat, voice or in-app, without a hotline queue.

ClaimingThe worst day should be the simplest part

  • 07

    Guided claims

    Tell people what's covered, what's needed, and where their claim stands.

  • 08

    Faster assessment

    Close the gap between filing and resolution.

  • +

    Something else entirely

    Combine directions, or bring one nobody has thought of.

Why efficiency matters here

Every piece of friction in this journey costs someone money, and that cost ends up inside the price of protection. Make the end-to-end process genuinely more efficient — and richer in first-party data that customers have agreed to share — and something better becomes possible: insurance that costs less, fits the individual more closely, and is actually worth holding.

That's the prize. Not a slicker app — a better deal for the person buying it.

Use cases in this challenge

The business problems Tasco has published for this challenge. Open one to read its goal, requirements, budget and timeline.

  • AI for Insurance: Scaling Compulsory Motor Insurance Renewal

    Tasco

    Automotive and mobility
    Budget
    To be determined
    Closed

    Closed on 15 Oct 2026
    23:59 ICT

    View use case

Timeline

Three weeks, six fixed dates. The build period opens the same day as applications.

Start on day one

The build period opens on 23 September — the same day applications do. The written brief, FAQ and submission template are published from day one. The 7 October briefing is a mid-point deep dive with Tasco, not the starting gun. Teams that wait for it lose two of their three weeks.

  1. Applications open

    23 Sept, 00:00 ICT

  2. Briefing with Tasco's business team

    7 Oct, 15:30 ICT · Online

  3. Applications close

    15 Oct, 23:59 ICT

  4. Every applicant hears back

    16 Oct

  5. Demo day: ten teams present live

    22 Oct, 14:00–16:00 ICT

  6. Pilot scoping begins

    23 Oct

How selection works

GenAI Fund screens every submission and selects the ten teams who present. Judges and Tasco's team score live on demo day. No submission sits in a queue for a week.

Winning isn't the end of it. Here's the month that follows.

Most programmes stop at the trophy and leave “next steps to be discussed”. Here's the actual month, so you can plan the resourcing before you apply.

  1. 23 Oct – 1 Nov

    Selection and scoping conversation

    Tasco confirms which teams it wants to take forward. You present your solution and your commercial case to the leadership team and the business owners who'd run it. Mutual NDA signed.

    Bring
    The demo and a one-page commercial proposal
    Done when
    Both sides agree to run a pilot
  2. Week 1 · 3–7 Nov

    Scope lock

    You and Tasco agree the exact boundary: which use case, which users, which systems, which success metrics. Data access and approvals are requested here, not later.

    Bring
    Your integration and data requirements in writing
    Done when
    A one-page scope both sides have signed
  3. Week 2 · 10–14 Nov

    Build

    You build against Tasco's real context in a sandboxed environment, with an assigned business owner on call.

    Bring
    Engineering time
    Done when
    The core workflow runs end to end on test data
  4. Week 3 · 17–21 Nov

    Integrate and checkpoint

    Connect the agreed systems and hold a mid-point review. Anything not working by this checkpoint doesn't go into week 4.

    Bring
    A working demo against the agreed metrics
    Done when
    The checkpoint review passes
  5. Week 4 · 24–28 Nov

    Test and evaluate

    Tasco's own team runs the solution against the week-one metrics, with real operational users where approvals allow. You see the results — not a verdict behind closed doors.

    Bring
    Support and fixes during testing
    Done when
    Results are written up against each metric
  6. By 5 Dec

    Tasco decides

    One of three outcomes, in writing: scale into a production pilot and commercial terms, extend on a revised scope, or stop, with the reasons. You keep the results either way.

The point of a 90-day format is that “no” arrives fast enough to be useful.

Good to know

Entering a pilot is Tasco's decision, made after demo day. One month is the target for a tightly scoped pilot — a broader scope runs longer, and the scope is agreed jointly in week 1 before anyone commits. Dates flex with the enterprise's calendar.

What to submit

Make it tangible: show what improves for the customer, how it works, and what you'd need to test it for real.

  1. 1

    Problem framing

    Who you're helping and which friction you're solving.

  2. 2

    Prototype or design

    The proposed experience and how it works. A working prototype is preferred.

  3. 3

    Impact and assumptions

    The improvement you expect, and what you're assuming.

  4. 4

    Implementation needs

    Data, integrations and enterprise support required.

  5. 5

    Responsible design

    Data access, consent and privacy assumptions, and where staff review is needed.

Judged on

  • Practical impact
  • Credible execution
  • Scale potential
  • Compliance fit
  • Feasibility and time to pilot
  • Customer experience
  • Operational sustainability
  • Implementation clarity

State your data, integration and consent assumptions explicitly. That's not a compliance box — it's part of what makes a proposal credible, and the criteria reward it.

Design requirements

Proposals should avoid premium discounts, cashback, or disguised price incentives; use accurate communications without fabricated urgency; explain data access, consent and privacy assumptions; account for seasonal demand; and identify where staff review is needed.

Detailed requirements are included in the participant brief and discussed during the briefing session.

You won't build this blind

Briefings, workshops and partner resources to help you build something Tasco can evaluate.

  • Business briefing and open Q&A

    Understand the journey and the operating reality behind it, from the people who run it.

  • Technical and business workshops

    Sharpen the solution with mentors and technology partners.

  • Mentor access

    Business and technical guidance through the build window.

  • Partner credits and tools

    Explore resources through partner programmes, including eligible Microsoft for Startups benefits.

Partner credits, tools, pilot entry, investment and any subsequent engagement depend on selection, eligibility, due diligence and the relevant partner's or enterprise's terms. Selected partner workshops may take place in person; schedules go to participants.

The people scoring your work

Five things people get wrong about this

You've probably been burned by something that looked like this. Fair. Here's what's actually true.

  • What people assume

    “This is free R&D for Tasco.”

    What's actually true

    You keep your IP. Mutual NDA before any pilot, and the scope is agreed jointly in week 1 — before you commit engineering time.

  • What people assume

    “I'd never get past procurement.”

    What's actually true

    There is no RFP here. The people who set the brief and hold the budget are the people reviewing your work — that's the entire format.

  • What people assume

    “I don't know insurance.”

    What's actually true

    Most strong submissions don't start there. The written brief, the 7 October session and an assigned business owner close that gap. Bring the solution.

  • What people assume

    “Three weeks isn't enough to build anything.”

    What's actually true

    Build opens 23 September, not 7 October. And nobody's asking for production software — show what works and how it scales.

  • What people assume

    “No cash prize — so what's the upside?”

    What's actually true

    A named enterprise customer, a market, and investment of up to US$100,000 on the table for teams that come through the pilot.

Questions people ask

No. The scope is open: any AI solution that makes the insurance experience better for the people using it. We publish the compulsory motor journey as a worked example because it touches nearly every driver in Vietnam — not because it's the boundary.